Cor! Values

28/11/11

Pippa Middleton has secured a publishing deal.

The younger sibling of Princess Catherine, famous for being the possibly-sexier sister of the sexy royal, has received a reported £400k advance from Penguin to do a book on hosting parties, and there is brouhaha and fulmination in the word of letters.

All right, lookee. This happens from time to time, and it’s important to recognise a couple of things. First, this is not a statement of confidence in an author’s creative talent or even a moment of nepotism and intrigue. It is a commercial transaction. It could as easily be a deal to endorse perfume made by Chanel, record an album of folks songs with Daniel Radcliffe or design lingerie with Agent Provocateur. If it was a face-cream sponsorship, half a million quid would look a bit minor. Pippa Middleton may or may not write well, but at this point the book is only a gleam in her eye. The deal was done, apparently, on the concept, and the brute fact of it is that Penguin’s imprint believe they will make money on it. This is a good thing. An imprint which makes money then has more money to spend the following year on more conventional book deals. It’s not a point of comparison for anyone writing a book unless their name is also Middleton, or Windsor. The only way in which this is bad is if the book tanks, which could happen, but Penguin presumably reckon they’ll make their money back on the strength of royal appeal in the first instance and in the second the, er, long tail of Middleton admirers who believe subconsciously that if they buy the book for a female friend Pippa herself may explode from its pages wearing nothing but an ostrich feather and a pair of Manolos.

I’ve been on the pointy end of this discussion, because I got a large (albeit inaccurately reported) advance for The Gone-Away World, and there will forever be a special place in my heart for Doug Johntsone for saying, basically, that whatever it had been the book was worth it. In a way, that was a different situation; there was an actual book to argue over, and a writer who proposed to be a writer for the foreseeable future, and so on. Even so, the logic of commerce was in play in pretty much the same way. Free news coverage attends big advances, discussion and brand-awareness and all that jazz, and William Heinemann/Random House believed that in the long run the decision would pay them. Because that is what big companies do, and international publishing houses are big companies.

Much more important:

The wicked souls from @Gollancz asserted on Twitter that the advance was actually for “the first two books in an epic Space Opera sequence”… Which was incredibly exciting and totally mendacious! Exciting because if we had an openly geeky royal cool person, that would actually slightly rock. And mendacious because, so far as we know, we do not!

However, I have seen an early pitch for this non-existent book from a parallel universe, and because confidentiality does not extend across quantum realities, I am permitted to share it with you…

In the deep darkness of the Ataraxis Cleft, the people of the Lace await the coming of the one they call the Harbinger. The Lace have forgotten whether the Harbinger is a sign of doom or exultation, and factions are developing which may ultimately provoke a civil war. The doomsayers are led by Old Prince Sheenan Igan, a battle-hardened warrior with a scathing wit. His son Jelbert is caught between his love for duchess Mellida of Cor, who is a secret believer in the doctrine of joy, a shoe model, and maker of holy pastries, and his filial duty to betray her to his father.

Meanwhile, Mellida’s clone Jacinta – created by the Evil Parliament for reasons even she does not know – is now an agent of the Luminal League, a ninja cult concealed within the priesthood of joy and dedicated to going out into the wider galactic realms to seek the actual truth – a heresy among the Lace. When Jelbert’s patrol ship encounters Jacinta’s stealth rocket and she sneaks aboard his vessel, she realises she has an opportunity to unravel the knot…

And in the blazing corona of the suns beyond the Cleft, something vast is waiting!..

(There. And not a bottom joke in sight. Oops, well, just one then.)

Sadly, it seems we’re going to get a book about entertaining instead.

Speculative, Science, Literary…

06/03/09

… and the next word is “Fiction”.

This isn’t actually a discussion I get a great deal out of, but since these thoughts occurred to me in the course of prepping for my slot on Night Waves yesterday to talk about Philip K. Dick, and since there was no way I was going to be able to go into them in detail there, I’ll share.

I was, incidentally, on the show with Graham Sleight, who knows more about this than I do, so I feel doubly spurious spouting off about it. All that aside, here goes.

First thought: that SF and Speculative Fiction are primarily defined by the fact that they revolve around a posit, a “what if”. That’s not to say that good SF doesn’t have character, plot, or good writing. It’s just that if it didn’t have a “what if” aspect to it – whether it’s “what if Germany and Japan had won WWII?” or “what if there were a world where a virus made you quasi-immortal but plugged you into an ecosystem which would make Jaws look like Jemima Puddleduck?” – it would be something else. The Man in the High Castle would be a story about a shopkeeper, a metalworker, a businessman, and a judo instructor. The Skinner would be a novel about fishermen and psychopaths. Or something.

Second thought: that’s what ticks off the literary establishment about Science Fiction. It’s not the fiction part people have a problem with, it’s the science. At the heart of literary writing and the literary/critical industry is the assumption that writing is about language and maybe the creation of a statement of “the ordinary mind on an ordinary day“. Literary writing is about words, beauty, emotion and communication of self.

(That’s not a perfect encapsulation, sure. I’m thinking out loud here. And I’m operating a “you broke it, you bought it” policy too, by the way. If you come in and bust up my nice neat little notion, your job is then to fix it up again so it means something.)

So to continue, it’s the science bit which is a problem. Speculative fiction is in the first instance a speculation. Science Fiction has its genesis in a thought experiment. Literary fiction has its roots elsewhere (which is not to say that Literary Fiction can’t have fireworks in it, either, by the way. And as I may have mentioned, I believe it should.)

This is a Two Cultures issue, with science and humanities butting heads right there on what the humanities consider to be their home ground.

Third thought: this reminds me of something. It reminds me of Sigmund Freud. (Yes, okay, everything reminds everyone of Sigmund Freud, because everything reminds everyone of their mother, and Sigmund Freud is now inextricably bound up with that realisation. Yes, I’m kidding. Go back to what I was saying.)

Sigmund Freud, right. Hard scientists view Freud with suspicion because his methods were essentially narrative. He wanted a literary career, even. And he refered to his case histories as Novellen, which is a very specific German word for a particular literary form in which the story progression is logical, if surprising, and the symbolism or subtext is often explained at the end.

Freud, in other words, is using a literary approach to science, and it makes people crazy.

See where I’m going with this? What Science Fiction and Speculative Fiction are to the humanities, Freud &co. are to hard science.

Which is why everyone gets to hot under the collar about both of these areas, and probably also why both of them are interesting, even compelling areas to play in.

Fourth thought: I still think terms like Science Fiction and Crime Fiction and Literary Fiction are more about shelving conventions and stock management than they are about what books and stories are…

Vodka and Velocity

02/12/08

Back from Russia and only a few minutes before I have to go and have media training. What’s Moscow like? No one ever answers that question. They tell you a story instead. Why? Because the only way to describe the place is to share the experience.

Just saying that Moscow is the city which stood down Napoleon and Hitler, which still has the apartment block where party officials lived under Stalin – and from which they frequently vanished – alongside vast wealth and vast poverty, which has a horrible HIV rate and a stunningly beautiful population… these things are not enough.

I don’t have time to tell you stories right now.

I am, however, interested in the whole Moscow/story thing theoretically as well, in the I believe one aspect of fiction is the promulgation of massively compressed statements of your own second-to-second experience, like a vidcap of your what it is to be you. Dmitry Bykov (about whom more anon) suggested that fiction makes us deathless.

The other thing I will say is that drivers in Moscow have a varied understanding of speed limits, lane markings, and what constitutes survival-friendly conduct on the road. It is a vast stew of competing styles, interweaving and producing one great symphony of automotive terror.

Leave your bicycle at home.

So what’s the vodka bit? You’ll have to wait, I’m out of time.

Good to be home, though.