<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nick Harkaway &#187; Batman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickharkaway.com/tag/batman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickharkaway.com</link>
	<description>Website and blog of Nick Harkaway, author of “The Gone-Away World”.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Harris vs Batman</title>
		<link>http://www.nickharkaway.com/2011/06/harris-vs-batman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nickharkaway.com/2011/06/harris-vs-batman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Harkaway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickharkaway.com/?p=3157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nickharkaway.com/2011/06/harris-vs-batman/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.nickharkaway.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/unedifying-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="unedifying" /></a><h4>Labour MP Tom Harris doesn&#8217;t like Dundee&#8217;s new degree in Comic Studies.</h4>
<p>Okay, this is going to be a brief post because I&#8217;m a bit busy, and I&#8217;m going to set out two things you should probably know pretty baldly.</p>
<p>1. Tom Harris and I seem to disagree about everything. </p>
<p>It began ...<a href="http://www.nickharkaway.com/2011/06/harris-vs-batman/"><img src="http://s59381.gridserver.com/wp-content/themes/nick_harkaway/images/btn_continue.png" id="continue-link-wrapper"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>Labour MP Tom Harris doesn&#8217;t like Dundee&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-13668885">new degree</a> in Comic Studies.</h4>
<p>Okay, this is going to be a brief post because I&#8217;m a bit busy, and I&#8217;m going to set out two things you should probably know pretty baldly.</p>
<p><strong>1. </strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TomHarrisMP/"><strong>Tom Harris</strong></a><strong> and I seem to disagree about everything. </strong></p>
<p>It began when I made some unkind references to Tony Blair and the War on Terror and the War In Iraq and the frankly shameful business of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Dossier">dodgy dossier</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_Dossier">45 minute claim</a>, and the UK&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nickharkaway.com/2010/02/can-you-hear-the-thunder/">increasingly obvious complicity in torture</a> around the world. It has not greatly changed course since then.</p>
<p><strong>2. I like comics. I did, in fact, study comics a bit at a university.</strong></p>
<p>So I am either biased or in a position to know the benefits of studying comics, take your pick. Incidentally, the course in question was &#8220;Aspects of American Culture&#8221;, which introduced me to <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/book-of-a-lifetime-the-immediate-experience-by-robert-warshow-841038.html">Robert Warshow</a>&#8216;s writing (on movies, anti-communism on the left, McCarthyism, and, yes, comics), which in turn influenced my thinking in The Gone-Away World and Angelmaker and in general enriches my life. The course was part of a Media, Culture, and Ideology paper, the degree was Social and Political Science, the other components of my path through it being Revolutions, Russian 20th Century History, and Global Security. But of course, Mr Harris is right, it wasn&#8217;t a proper &#8220;university&#8221; (see below), it was just some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Cambridge">dusty provincial flophouse</a> for the academic dregs, so what do they know about academic or real-world value?</p>
<p><strong>Okay, that off my chest, here goes:</strong></p>
<p>I see absolutely no reason to dispute the value of a Master&#8217;s in Comic Studies. The debate about film schools is always thriving within the UK film industry &#8211; those who went generally feel it was hugely helpful and those who didn&#8217;t can&#8217;t understand how they could waste all that time. They have different skill sets and make different films, and that&#8217;s all to the good.</p>
<p>The comics industry is hard to break into and a little opaque; one of the functions of degree courses in media industries is to break through that kind of barrier, give people a sense not only of how they need to produce their work but how to get people to look at it, how the industry as a whole functions. In film, for example, it&#8217;s not uncommon to meet writers with a strong grip on demographics and studio economics. So a standard movie pitch might not only go:</p>
<p><em>It&#8217;s about this guy who discovers his wife is actually an alien bent on destroying the world, and he loves her so much he decides to help, but in the end she realises she loves him so much she can&#8217;t do it and they farm alpacas instead&#8230;</em></p>
<p>But also:</p>
<p><em>It fills the gap in your slate for the 18-34 urban demographic. If we make it for under £5m you&#8217;ll make the budget back on Brazilian rights alone.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave discussion of teaching the techniques and necessities of comics writing and drawing etc to others, and move on&#8230;</p>
<p>The thing which finally triggered my decision to blog about the spat &#8211; and which remains relevant now that Tom Harris has changed his position a little &#8211; was <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TomHarrisMP/status/78033746003111936">this</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nickharkaway.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/unedifying.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3158" title="unedifying" src="http://www.nickharkaway.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/unedifying.jpg" alt="" width="571" height="186" /></a>Right ho.</p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2011/01/captain-america-insecurities-anxieties-comic-book-metaphor/">a few things</a> a degree in Batman could teach you:</strong></p>
<p>The conflicted nature of US self-perception relating to written law as against justice; one face of US foreign policy and its origins &#8211; and latterly, consequences; aspects of US copyright and IP law; history and consequences of the Great Depression; the myth of the &#8216;big break&#8217;, the lottery, and the notion of Hard Work; the interweaving of the US&#8217; Puritan origins with capitalism and charity; the nature of the American relationship with the gun; the historical rise of Freudianism in US culture; issues of race and gender in the US&#8230;</p>
<p>And on and on and on. This is an icon, shaped by every major event in US history since its inception, handled by many writers, editors, artists. Batman isn&#8217;t just Bruce Wayne: he&#8217;s Uncle Sam on a bad day.</p>
<p><strong>Seriously? I can understand if you don&#8217;t want to study that. But taking the idea as a standard of foolishness? No. That, I do not understand.</strong></p>
<p>[<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/johnfreeman_dtb/">John Freeman</a>'s piece on this is <a href="http://downthetubescomics.blogspot.com/2011/06/scottish-mp-savages-dundee-universitys.html">here</a>. No doubt Mr Harris will respond. Round and round and round we go.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickharkaway.com/2011/06/harris-vs-batman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bat and the Bonk</title>
		<link>http://www.nickharkaway.com/2008/11/the-bat-and-the-bonk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nickharkaway.com/2008/11/the-bat-and-the-bonk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Harkaway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad sex in fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Booker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Morrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitbread]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickharkaway.com/2008/11/the-bat-and-the-bonk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<h4>Grant Morrison has killed Batman. (Note carefully how the dastardly genius has done the deed first and told everyone about it afterwards.)</h4>

<p>This is interesting, because Batman has no excuse to return. He has no superpowers. If he actually dies, any subsequent resurrection will be hard to manage &#8211; though far ...<a href="http://www.nickharkaway.com/2008/11/the-bat-and-the-bonk/"><img src="http://s59381.gridserver.com/wp-content/themes/nick_harkaway/images/btn_continue.png" id="continue-link-wrapper"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><a href="http://www.grant-morrison.com/"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Grant Morrison</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"> has </span><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news//newstopics/celebritynews/3517456/Batman-to-be-killed-off-after-70-years.html"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">killed Batman</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">. (Note carefully how the dastardly genius has done the deed first and told everyone about it afterwards.)</span></h4>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">This is interesting, because Batman has no excuse to return. He has no superpowers. If he actually dies, any subsequent resurrection will be hard to manage &#8211; though far from impossible. Parallel world Waynes, fiendish masterplans, and temporal </span><a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/jiggery-pokery"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">jiggerypokery</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"> could all yield a return of the man himself (sort of).</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Actually, even as I sit here pondering, I can see some really interesting ways back &#8211; not the least of which is to refuse to identify the new Batman for a while. Much more fun that drafting in one of his obvious stand-ins &#8211; let&#8217;s have some mystery. <span id="more-788"></span></span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">But here&#8217;s a thing: why are we killing heroes? First Captain America, now Batman. And even James Bond has been reincarnated without quips, gadgets, or suggestive eyebrows. It&#8217;s back-to-basics all over the fictional universe. Is this a belated millennium thing? A post-Obama thing? Is there a groundswell of emotional and mythic spring-cleaning going on?</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">All these fictional universes have been getting complicated recently, of course. They&#8217;ve been carrying the last century&#8217;s baggage &#8211; arch-enemies, bad costume choices, implausible scenarios. Much like reality, they&#8217;ve been stuck with a lot of crap they wish they hadn&#8217;t done. (Goodness -is this a sublimation thing? Are we finally realising we can&#8217;t push the reset button in real life? That there&#8217;s no such thing as &#8216;drawing a line&#8217; under an issue, as <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en-us&amp;q=blair+%22draw+a+line%22&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8">Tony Blair was so fond of doing</a>?)</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">There&#8217;s definitely a desire for simplicity out there, of course &#8211; we live in an increasingly complex world, and it&#8217;s annoying. Nothing we do is without consequence, without footnotes. In stories like this, we get to start fresh.</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">___________________</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Speaking of fresh&#8230; the Bad Sex In Fiction award was given out again last night, this time to </span><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/nov/25/bad-sex-johnson-updike-fiction"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Rachel Johnson</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">. The award was established by </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auberon_Waugh"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Auberon Waugh</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">: </span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: #333333; line-height: 19px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">to &#8220;gently dissuade&#8221; authors from including &#8220;unconvincing, perfunctory, embarrassing or redundant passages of a sexual nature in otherwise sound literary novels&#8221;.</span></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">I am, alas, unable to locate a picture of the award itself; a web search rapidly takes one into the realms of scandalous Victorian erotica and pictures of Norman Mailer. I&#8217;m very interested in that word &#8216;sound&#8217;, though. It seems to me to hold the key to which books get literary prizes &#8211; not just the bad sex award, but in general. I&#8217;m thinking about this because I got asked about the Booker again in an interview the other day. The thought which always occurs to me when literary prizes come up is the big furore over Harry Potter and the 1999 Whitbread Prize.</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">For anyone who doesn&#8217;t remember (or didn&#8217;t care):</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Seamus Heaney&#8217;s translation of </span><a href="http://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/nael/beowulf/introbeowulf.htm"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Beowulf</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"> beat </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_the_Prisoner_of_Azkaban"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"> for the Whitbread Prize on a 5-4 decision. There was something of a </span><a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990DE3DC113CF93AA15752C0A9669C8B63&amp;sec=&amp;spon=&amp;&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=beowulf%20heaney%20potter&amp;st=cse"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">spat</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">. Robert Harris was one of the judges on the side of Harry Potter:</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">&#8220;There&#8217;s an English snobbishness that began in this country around the time of Virginia Woolf and that has infected the bloodstream like a poison,&#8221; he said, noting that it was his understanding that the prize, set up 29 years ago by Whitbread &amp; Company, the British beverage maker and pub chain, was supposed to go to the most enjoyable book of the year. &#8220;It says that if everyone can understand something it&#8217;s no good and if only a select few can understand it, then it has literary merit.&#8221;</span><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Anthony Holden (also a judge) did not agree:</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">&#8220;If I&#8217;m a pompous prat for saying that Seamus Heaney&#8217;s &#8216;Beowulf&#8217; is greater literature than Harry Potter,&#8221; he said, &#8221;then I&#8217;m proud to be a pompous prat.&#8221;</span></span></span></div>
<div>
<p>Mm. Soundbites not to offer up&#8230;  Well. I can see where he&#8217;s coming from, but the point is that as far as I can ascertain Harris was right: the Whitbread was supposed to be about what&#8217;s enjoyable, rather than what is &#8216;great literature&#8217;. Now, Holden may find only great literature enjoyable, in which case, fine. As <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article541567.ece">Dave Baddiel</a> points out, though, each category is supposed to be in equal contention for the overall prize. Poetry is always going to be more &#8216;literary&#8217; than writing for children. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_Whitbread_Awards">The year before</a>, as a matter of interest, David Almond&#8217;s fabulous Skellig won the children&#8217;s prize, and the main prize went to Ted Hughes&#8217; Birthday Letters.</div>
<div>
<p>Enjoyability, of course, may be an even more tricky quality to judge than literary-ness.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickharkaway.com/2008/11/the-bat-and-the-bonk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

