Thoughts about Wikileaks and government…
[Image by the World Economic Forum, via Wikipedia, Under CC. See here.]
I’ve just finished a draft of the new book and my daughter has at least begun to gasp the concept of day and night, so I find myself with time to read a newspaper or two. Aside from Brian Blessed reportedly throttling someone for saying he didn’t like Flash Gordon (I’m even more inclined to admire him after this episode) the media is rightly devoting a great deal of time to the Wikileaks cables. Official sources, generally, want to discuss the grave security implications of the leaks, rather than the content of the documents. This is an understandable but fatuous attempt to change the topic to more comfortable ground.
What the recent leaks demonstrate, in my opinion – and what our leaders are apparently at pains to distract us from – is that we are, globally, governed and administered by absolute bastards who as far as I can see hold law, ethics, morality, and humanity in contempt. It is drably predictable that in the face of the revelations contained in the war logs and now in the cables, all our political class can talk about is how rotten it is of nasty Mr Assange and his geek-anarchist treasonites to tell anyone how the world is being run. This miserable refusal to discuss the real issues is the root of the much-bruited disengagement of the public with our democracy. The public wants to talk substance. The apparat does not – because it has no answers which are not shameful when exposed to the light of day.
For example: a few years ago, Britain, along with a number of other countries, took a stand on cluster munitions. We signed up to a treaty which outlawed them because they are essentially impossible to clear and have a tendency to blow up children years and years after the conflict they were deployed for is over. So what happened? It would seem that senior officials and politicians, including David Miliband, connived with the US – which for its own reasons refused to sign up to the treaty – so that cluster munitions could be based on British soil in defiance of the prohibition. The pros and cons of the US position are uninteresting to me. What is utterly typical and totally unacceptable is that people supposedly loyal to Britain and hence to our parliamentary democracy worked with a foreign power to circumvent the binding decision of elected MPs and undermine our country’s commitment to a better world. I suspect that Mr Miliband believes he hews closely to ethics, morality, and the law, and that he feels a great love of his fellow man. The truth is not necessarily otherwise; he may have been squeezed into this position, and the one he occupied regarding Diego Garcia and rendition, by those around him. In other words, the list absolute bastards in this equation may not include him. All the same, the next time David finds himself rubbing shoulders with Angelina Jolie, I hope she slaps him in the chops.

