Jack Straw, you’re a funny guy!

27/02/09

Dear Mr Straw,

            I was delighted to read your splendid piece in the Guardian (Comment Is Free/”Our Record Isn’t Perfect…” 27th February 2009). You really are an amazing man! I haven’t laughed so much in years. No doubt those blighters at Bremner, Bird & Fortune will be stealing your jokes any day now. I think my favourite bit was where you said, with an absolutely straight face, that our democratic system was a guard against an intrusive state because a heavy-handed party could be voted out. And the way you said it really sounded as if you thought that wasn’t going to happen to you at the next election. Honestly, Jack Dee couldn’t have done it better.

            Like every good comic, you kept some of your best stuff for the last few lines. I love that little mention of the Freedom of Information Act, which was hilarious on so many levels – the fact that you have personally refused to comply with an FoI ruling in the last week, for example, or your colleague David Miliband’s recent and somewhat shaming encounters with the courts over possible British complicity in the torture of Binyam Mohamed, which appears to have taken place while you were Foreign Secretary.

            I think my favourite thing is what you don’t say: that it’s now an offence to take a picture of a bobby or possess information “likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism”. A lot of tourists will be in breach of that one, I fear. And of course, police officers regularly cite anti-terror laws in mundane situations and use them to harrass your legitimate opponents (at your own party conference, no less). Then, too, in a time of asymmetric warfare, almost any information of any kind could fall into that latter category – the location of a school; a bus timetable; a chemistry textbook. At least we’re all equal now – everyone’s guilty of something.

            There are one or two other details which really spice the pot – for example:

            42 Day Detention (you, of course, have recently expressed doubts over that, but voted in favour of 90 days, so one knows where your heart is);

            that brief attempt in 2005 to deploy evidence obtained by torture in British courts, which went all the way to the Law Lords; 

            those extremely expensive I.D. cards whose precise purpose – beyond monitoring our movements and controlling us more effectively – is hard to ascertain;

            and of course that DNA database which contains the samples of a large number of innocent people and children which the European Court of Human Rights has ordered you to dispose of, but which you propose, by sleight of hand, to retain.

            And then, to cap it all, that final, ringing line, delivered without a whiff of irony. I honestly don’t know how you do it, Mr Straw. I would have been unable to finish the gag – because you have not ‘extended liberties’ or ‘constrained government’ during your time in power. You have transformed a system which was arbitrary, unfair and bigoted into one which is universal, oppressive, and arrogant. And yet, with that glorious, Blairish disregard for reality which marks the best political comedy these days, you proclaim yourself a champion of civil liberties.

            You are a riot.

            Yours Sincerely,

 

            Nick Harkaway

            

[Edit: since I posted this, it's been reported that various government departments and similar routinely abuse anti-terror powers, and the Home Secretary has, apparently with absolute impunity, gone over the head of the court to order the arrest of five men in spite of a ruling that their bail should not be withdrawn. Whatever else, we live under a government which absolutely believes that executive power trumps law.]

7 Comments to “Jack Straw, you’re a funny guy!”

  • thorrad said on February 27th, 2009:

    They say “V for Vendetta” was a graphic novel. I was thinking it might have been a documentary of the last administrations on both sides of the Atlantic.

  • Foz Meadows said on February 28th, 2009:

    This makes me angry. Dammit, Modern Western Governments, can’t you go one lousy decade without seriously undermining the notion of absolute civil liberties or human rights? Or, let’s be generous, even a week? Grrr.

  • MikeCamel said on February 28th, 2009:

    Who the **** are we supposed to vote for in May, that’s what I want to know. Tories. Surely not: they’re still Tories. LibDems: please, please drop the ridiculous proportional representation lark. UKIP: don’t make me laugh.

    So, who?

    -Mike.

  • Nick Harkaway said on February 28th, 2009:

    Mike – I’m somewhat of a fan of PR, though I can see why one might have reservations. For me, it’s a Wisdom of Crowds kinduva thing. I feel increasingly that the party system requires MPs to function as two or at best three large, stupid collectives rather than an assemblage of expertise and interests representing the regions and the British electorate in general.

    As to who we’re supposed to vote for – I’m probably voting Lib Dems next time I get a chance, on the basis that I want a hung parliament, although I’m not sure; Glenda Jackson has been a staunch defender of many things I want defended. It just irks me that she owes her allegiance to this daft crowd we have in office now.

    And the Tories… who will almost certainly be our next government… are distinguished from Labour only by some halfway decent environmental policies I don’t believe they’re likely to stick to, and a small but notable collection of lunatics who are much too close to the centre of power for me to be content.

    Aye, me. It’s a mess, is what it is. Maybe we can get Obama when he’s done with the US in eight years…

  • dave hutchinson said on March 1st, 2009:

    We can’t have Obama. I asked. They offered to send us some Puritans instead.

  • Nick Harkaway said on March 7th, 2009:

    Oh, yes, just what we need…

  • foursgiant said on May 21st, 2009:

    The worst nightmare (selection)
    sunderland’s electoral registers contains Different types of errors these errors consist of placed wrong electoral registration numbers, groups of numbers running in reverse order, spacing irregularities in registration
    numbers, missing numbers, and names without numbers, sometimes the same person has been given a wrong electoral registration number more than once. These mistakes are not just common human error as when the information is gathered together it becomes clear that a lot of the error numbers are linked by common
    factors eg. the error numbers are quite often placed in the same position between the same two numbers year after year.

Add your comment: