Cover art is weird

15/01/09

I originally posted this as a comment over on John Scalzi’s blog, but it’s kinda fun and I thought I’d post it again here. ‘Cos, you know. When you write something decent, you want everyone to see.:

extra_img_02

Cover art is weird.

I say this with the confidence of someone who cannot draw an apple with a stencil. And (watch closely) I shall say it again:

Cover art is weird.

And you know what else? SF cover art is particularly weird.

I feel this way because – and you all know this as well as I do – in many cases, the cover of an SF novel has absolutely nothing to do with what’s in the book, a tradition inherited from pulps and comic books in the middle of the 20th century. Slam a nice cover on it, and the kids may not notice the inside is in mono and has a story about a mutant bunny instead of a story about robots.

There have been some classy efforts to do something a bit more interesting (and sane) recently – I like the covers on Jeff Somers’ books, kinda Old Penguin meets pulp meets… etc. – but basically the process seems to be: SF novel = space + raygun + explosion + Darth Vader/Luke Skywalker kinda shapes in the background.

On the other hand, there are some more ‘grown-up style’ editions kicking around for some lucky authors, and I thought the UK cover for Glass Books of the Dream Eaters was actually sexy. I wanted to buy it cocktails and put my hand on its knee. I bought the book itself instead; not something I would normally do in the course of a sexual relationship, but you have to make allowances when the object of your affection is non-sentient and entirely covered in transparent blue polyvinyl chloride.

Although now that I think about it I did once go on a date with someone who matches that description all too well. Er.

But for the most part, it’s like all those Miles Vorkosigan novels I like so much: why does a story about a guy who was damaged in the womb and never tops five foot one, whose face is sorta square-lookin’ and who uses his personality and his brain to take on the universe have a picture of a six foot three inch tall, handsome blonde guy with a raygun on the front? Or am I being dumb?

It’s mysterious. Then again, you could ask why my book is pink. People have. I do not know. I do know I think my cover rocks, but I am also aware of people who find it stinky. Stinky is in the nose of the beholder, it seems. But even so…

Thus, I return to my theme:
cover art is weird.

9 Comments to “Cover art is weird”

  • Clare Harwood said on May 11th, 2009:

    I in no manner wish to belittle all that you and Glass Books for the Dreameaters shared but I had a similar experience.
    Someone asked what I wanted for my birthday. This someone is also a book-nerd so I felt confident when I told them that I wanted that book, in hardcover. I was very, very specific! Imagine my disappointment when I recieved a teeny, paperback sized present. *sniff*
    I now own both paperback and hardback, for which I feel almost no shame. Almost…

  • Nick Harkaway said on May 11th, 2009:

    Actually, that’s a really interesting point: has anyone ever said

    “I want a paperback you will want to go to bed with?”

    Because that might actually be wise.

  • Clare Harwood said on May 11th, 2009:

    I think it’s because readers still think that the hardback is the virginal product of any work. The paperback is a cheap duplicate designed to appeal to the masses. Pish!

    The closer a product is to actual act of creation, the more highly we value it.

    I’m sure there’s an evolutionary reason in there somewhere!

  • Nick Harkaway said on May 11th, 2009:

    Oh, well, I completely get that – or at least, it makes sense to me in terms of my mild obsession with the idea that humans crave connection (and recognise it).

    But… I mean… people definitely do, er, like cheap things. And even cheap things can be sexy. Sometimes more so than expensive things.

    *waves hands, flounders, hides under table*

    I’m going to shut up now. But… I think it must be possible to create a paperback which is cool and sexy by dint of its obvious cheapness…

  • Clare Harwood said on May 12th, 2009:

    Agreed. I think paperbacks generally become sexy by association. Hardbacks are relegated to sitting on comfy sofas with coffee nearby, whereas Danny Wallace’s Yes Man has made it’s way onto a gnarled Slovakian train and Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer has trudged to the tippity top of a Scottish mountain.

    I adore my collection of hardbacks but I suppose they are the product of reckless consumerism. Beautifully gaudy examples of frivolity and joy!

  • gormster said on May 26th, 2010:

    Nick, your book is not pink. It is black and there is some red on the front.

  • Nick Harkaway said on May 26th, 2010:

    True – and yet, false… The US hardback was pink :)

  • Black Ty said on November 23rd, 2010:

    lol @ hardback, that must be a uk thing

    paperbacks are great for writing in, for taking to the beach and not caring if they are damaged by salt water, sand, beer, or the greasy food you’re eating while laying out. Every paperback I’ve read is beat to shit. But I don’t throw them away. I keep them on the shelf too, grape jelly stains and all.

    Hardcovers get treated like my comic books; love and respect.

  • Jerri Stone said on April 7th, 2012:

    The pink cover evoked my strong sensual experiences with: cupcake sprinkles, Dunkin’ Donuts, antifreeze, cosmetics, prophylactics, Koolaid, pharmaceuticals and other various poisons. Perfect!

    Jerri

Add your comment: