Cover art is weird

15/01/09

I originally posted this as a comment over on John Scalzi’s blog, but it’s kinda fun and I thought I’d post it again here. ‘Cos, you know. When you write something decent, you want everyone to see.:

extra_img_02

Cover art is weird.

I say this with the confidence of someone who cannot draw an apple with a stencil. And (watch closely) I shall say it again:

Cover art is weird.

And you know what else? SF cover art is particularly weird.

I feel this way because – and you all know this as well as I do – in many cases, the cover of an SF novel has absolutely nothing to do with what’s in the book, a tradition inherited from pulps and comic books in the middle of the 20th century. Slam a nice cover on it, and the kids may not notice the inside is in mono and has a story about a mutant bunny instead of a story about robots.

There have been some classy efforts to do something a bit more interesting (and sane) recently – I like the covers on Jeff Somers’ books, kinda Old Penguin meets pulp meets… etc. – but basically the process seems to be: SF novel = space + raygun + explosion + Darth Vader/Luke Skywalker kinda shapes in the background.

On the other hand, there are some more ‘grown-up style’ editions kicking around for some lucky authors, and I thought the UK cover for Glass Books of the Dream Eaters was actually sexy. I wanted to buy it cocktails and put my hand on its knee. I bought the book itself instead; not something I would normally do in the course of a sexual relationship, but you have to make allowances when the object of your affection is non-sentient and entirely covered in transparent blue polyvinyl chloride.

Although now that I think about it I did once go on a date with someone who matches that description all too well. Er.

But for the most part, it’s like all those Miles Vorkosigan novels I like so much: why does a story about a guy who was damaged in the womb and never tops five foot one, whose face is sorta square-lookin’ and who uses his personality and his brain to take on the universe have a picture of a six foot three inch tall, handsome blonde guy with a raygun on the front? Or am I being dumb?

It’s mysterious. Then again, you could ask why my book is pink. People have. I do not know. I do know I think my cover rocks, but I am also aware of people who find it stinky. Stinky is in the nose of the beholder, it seems. But even so…

Thus, I return to my theme:
cover art is weird.

7 Comments to “Cover art is weird”

  • Clare Harwood said on May 11th, 2009:

    I in no manner wish to belittle all that you and Glass Books for the Dreameaters shared but I had a similar experience.
    Someone asked what I wanted for my birthday. This someone is also a book-nerd so I felt confident when I told them that I wanted that book, in hardcover. I was very, very specific! Imagine my disappointment when I recieved a teeny, paperback sized present. *sniff*
    I now own both paperback and hardback, for which I feel almost no shame. Almost…

  • Nick Harkaway said on May 11th, 2009:

    Actually, that’s a really interesting point: has anyone ever said

    “I want a paperback you will want to go to bed with?”

    Because that might actually be wise.

  • Clare Harwood said on May 11th, 2009:

    I think it’s because readers still think that the hardback is the virginal product of any work. The paperback is a cheap duplicate designed to appeal to the masses. Pish!

    The closer a product is to actual act of creation, the more highly we value it.

    I’m sure there’s an evolutionary reason in there somewhere!

  • Nick Harkaway said on May 11th, 2009:

    Oh, well, I completely get that – or at least, it makes sense to me in terms of my mild obsession with the idea that humans crave connection (and recognise it).

    But… I mean… people definitely do, er, like cheap things. And even cheap things can be sexy. Sometimes more so than expensive things.

    *waves hands, flounders, hides under table*

    I’m going to shut up now. But… I think it must be possible to create a paperback which is cool and sexy by dint of its obvious cheapness…

  • Clare Harwood said on May 12th, 2009:

    Agreed. I think paperbacks generally become sexy by association. Hardbacks are relegated to sitting on comfy sofas with coffee nearby, whereas Danny Wallace’s Yes Man has made it’s way onto a gnarled Slovakian train and Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer has trudged to the tippity top of a Scottish mountain.

    I adore my collection of hardbacks but I suppose they are the product of reckless consumerism. Beautifully gaudy examples of frivolity and joy!

  • gormster said on May 26th, 2010:

    Nick, your book is not pink. It is black and there is some red on the front.

  • Nick Harkaway said on May 26th, 2010:

    True – and yet, false… The US hardback was pink :)

Add your comment: